So the Groups are isomorphism if there is a bijection between them which preserves the group operations. Intuitively, and are the same group except that the elements and the operations may be written differently in and . Thus, any property which has which depends only on the group structure of (ie: can be derived from the group axioms - for example being an Abelian Group) also holds in . Note that this formally justifies writing all our group operations as since changing the symbol of the operation doesn't change the isomorphism type.
"Just Say -Morphism"
Because things like linear maps are differently named from Homomorphism (or Group Morphism) and even the toplological continuous maps, we have different names for what are essentially maps with properties. As such, most people just say "morphism" with the object they are talking about (ex: "vector space morphism" or "group morphism").
Examples
For any group using the identity map.
The exponential map defined is an isomorphism from to . Exp is a bijection since it has an inverse function and preserves the group operations since .
: Suppose the orders are the same. Think of the elements of and being glued together by a bijection (which exists since the sets are the same cardinality), namely each is glued to some . To obtain a map let be a permutation of and let be the permutation of which moves the elements of in the same way that moves the corresponding glued elements of . That is, if for some , then . Since the set bijection has an inverse, one can check that the map between symmetric groups also has an inverse, so then we found a homomorphism that is also bijective, so the two are isomorphic.
: If then if the sets are finite (the infinite case is harder and discussed at a different time) then any isomorphism between the two groups is a bijection between them. Thus then their cardinalities must be the same (since if since has elements, then has elements so ).
☐
Classification Theorems
Sometimes we want to talk about different groups, sets, rings, fields, vector spaces, ... to be isomorphic, but it's hard to have a definition for that that all agree. Theorems where is an object with property and another similarly structured object with that same property is isomorphic to . Theorems like this are called classification theorems.
Not Isomorphic
Being isomorphic occurs often when, given is an isomorphism, that:
is abelian iff is abelian
For all (the orders stay the same regardless of the bijection) (see 16 Homomorphisms, Isomorphisms#2 for the proof)
So if you find a property that doesn't follow these, then they aren't going to be isomorphic.
and are not isomorphic since the former is non-abelian while the latter is.
What Properties Determine Isomorphism?
So what minimum set of properties are needed to determine isomorphism of groups? It turns out if the relations are maintained (or the generators) then that determines the morphism. Namely, if is a set of generators for then any morphism is entirely determined by .