Isomorphism

isomorphism

The map φ:GH is called an isomorphism and G,H are said to be isomorphic or of the same isomorphism type, written GH if:

  1. φ is a Homomorphism (or Group Morphism) (ie: φ(xy)=φ(x)φ(y))
  2. φ is a bijection.

So the Groups G,H are isomorphism if there is a bijection between them which preserves the group operations. Intuitively, G and H are the same group except that the elements and the operations may be written differently in G and H. Thus, any property which G has which depends only on the group structure of G (ie: can be derived from the group axioms - for example being an Abelian Group) also holds in H. Note that this formally justifies writing all our group operations as since changing the symbol of the operation doesn't change the isomorphism type.

"Just Say -Morphism"

Because things like linear maps are differently named from Homomorphism (or Group Morphism) and even the toplological continuous maps, we have different names for what are essentially maps with properties. As such, most people just say "morphism" with the object they are talking about (ex: "vector space morphism" or "group morphism").

Examples

  1. For any group GG using the identity map.
  2. The exponential map exp:RR+ defined exp(x)=ex is an isomorphism from (R,+) to (R+,). Exp is a bijection since it has an inverse function ln and exp preserves the group operations since ex+y=exey.
  3. Consider Symmetric Group & Permutations:
    Namely, let Δ,Ω be nonempty sets. The symmetric groups SΔ and SΩ are isomorphic if |Δ|=|Ω|.

Proof

(): Suppose the orders are the same. Think of the elements of Δ and Ω being glued together by a bijection θ (which exists since the sets are the same cardinality), namely each xΔ is glued to some θ(x)Ω. To obtain a map φ:SΔSΩ let σSΔ be a permutation of Δ and let φ(σ) be the permutation of Ω which moves the elements of Ω in the same way that σ moves the corresponding glued elements of Δ. That is, if σ(x)=y for some x,yΔ, then φ(σ)(θ(x))=θ(y). Since the set bijection has an inverse, one can check that the map between symmetric groups also has an inverse, so then we found a homomorphism that is also bijective, so the two are isomorphic.

(): If SΔSΩ then if the sets are finite (the infinite case is harder and discussed at a different time) then any isomorphism between the two groups G,H is a bijection between them. Thus then their cardinalities must be the same (since if |SΔ|=n! since Δ has n elements, then Ω has n elements so |SΩ|=n!).

Classification Theorems

Sometimes we want to talk about different groups, sets, rings, fields, vector spaces, ... to be isomorphic, but it's hard to have a definition for that that all agree. Theorems where G is an object with property P and another similarly structured object X with that same property is isomorphic to G. Theorems like this are called classification theorems.

Not Isomorphic

Being isomorphic occurs often when, given φ:GH is an isomorphism, that:

  1. |G|=|H|
  2. G is abelian iff H is abelian
  3. For all xG,|x|=|φ(x)| (the orders stay the same regardless of the bijection) (see 16 Homomorphisms, Isomorphisms#2 for the proof)
    So if you find a property that doesn't follow these, then they aren't going to be isomorphic.
S3 and Z6Z are not isomorphic since the former is non-abelian while the latter is.

What Properties Determine Isomorphism?

So what minimum set of properties are needed to determine isomorphism of groups? It turns out if the relations are maintained (or the generators) then that determines the morphism. Namely, if {g1,,gk} is a set of generators for G then any morphism φ:GH is entirely determined by {φ(g1),,φ(gk)}.

For example, consider the dihedral group D8=r,s={1,r,r2,r3,sr,sr2,sr3}. Then note:

φ(sr2)=φ(s)φ(r)2

and any relation in G will be sent to a relation in H, so then the key relations in D8 (namely s2=1,r4=1,sr=r1s) then become:

φ(s2)=φ(1)φ(s)2=1

Similarly:

φ(r)4=1

and:

φ(s)φ(r)=φ(r)1φ(s)

So we could have the new group φ(D8)=φ(r),φ(s) just like for D8.