Another example. Let is an Abelian Group. Consider using the subgroup . Then:
but is not prime, so sadly we can't use the theorem. But is it isomorphic to a familiar group? It was abelian since is abelian for this specific example. Thus, what if the following was an isomorphism:
this seems like an arbitrary thing to do! But let's roll with it and check it's first a Homomorphism (or Group Morphism). The key relations in the domain are:
so then
so then
(so elements commute) so then
Note
I've added to all things that are mod 8 for this example.
This makes the general formula for is:
since any .
We've actually got our morphism! It's also surjective since it hits all 8 outputs ( is in the image, which generates the rest). Lastly , so if then we can check the $b
The first two will be quick to check, so let's look at (3). Define by .
Let's see if is well defined. Suppose . Then using Left (and Right) Cosets form a Subgroup, then . Thus . Then being a morphism. Thus showing it's well defined.
We should check is a morphism:
Now is surjective? Let , then there is some where . But then .
Now is injective? Notice:
so is injective. Thus is an isomorphism between the two groups!
☐
In General ...
How do we handle general ? The answer is the observation that we have the projection morphism where . But for the context of the observation, consider any morphism instead. Then:
How do we handle general ? The answer is the observation that we have the projection morphism where . But for the context of the observation, consider any morphism instead. Then: