11 - Setup for Group Morphisms
In section 3.1 we'll try to setup quotient groups. But before getting into the definition, let's consider an Reasoning Example for Quotient Group Definitions:
Consider the map
If we consider the values of
| Value |
|
|---|---|
| ... | ... |
| -1 | |
| 0 | 1 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | 1 |
| ... | ... |
| Notice it's very similar to Z over nZ - The Integers Modulo n for |
|
| $ | |
| \varphi(n) = \begin | |
| 1 & n \equiv 0 \bmod 4 \ | |
| i & n \equiv 1 \bmod 4 \ | |
| -1 & n \equiv 2 \bmod 4 \ | |
| -i & n \equiv 3 \bmod 4 | |
| \end | |
| $ |
Notice here that we've:
- partitioned
into four subsets: , where here is the preimage (not the inverse)
- ... but only one of these partitions is a Kernel of
. Namely: since is the identity in . Thus .- The other 3 are not subgroups, but they look very similar to
, only with some offset in the integers. You can say each of the is a "translation" of . For example:- Similarly
.
Here we have a clear bijection between
| Operation | Result |
|---|---|
| ... | ... |
| What's the pattern? Notice that: |
Iff you have
which is true by the definition of
iff:
which only happens when
We've defined an equivalence relation
So we'll adjust our notation:
Thus:
Then:
So instead of using
| So we claim that: |
is a Group.- The map
where is a Homomorphism (or Group Morphism) - The map
is an Isomorphism
The General Case
For the more general scenario, say we have some
(see Kernel) is a normal subgroup of- For each
if then . Otherwise then . Altnernatively, this set is for any with . We call these the cosets of .
So in our
The set of distinct cosets (ie: the set of equivalence classes) is a group under the operation:
Then this group is isomorphic to the image of
We'll do a lot more of this among many different lemmas.