11 - Setup for Group Morphisms
In section 3.1 we'll try to setup quotient groups. But before getting into the definition, let's consider an Reasoning Example for Quotient Group Definitions:
Consider the map
If we consider the values of
Value |
|
---|---|
... | ... |
-1 | |
0 | 1 |
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | 1 |
... | ... |
Notice it's very similar to Z over nZ - The Integers Modulo n for |
|
$ | |
\varphi(n) = \begin | |
1 & n \equiv 0 \bmod 4 \ | |
i & n \equiv 1 \bmod 4 \ | |
-1 & n \equiv 2 \bmod 4 \ | |
-i & n \equiv 3 \bmod 4 | |
\end | |
$ |
Notice here that we've:
- partitioned
into four subsets: , where here is the preimage (not the inverse)
- ... but only one of these partitions is a Kernel of
. Namely: since is the identity in . Thus .- The other 3 are not subgroups, but they look very similar to
, only with some offset in the integers. You can say each of the is a "translation" of . For example:- Similarly
.
Here we have a clear bijection between
Operation | Result |
---|---|
... | ... |
What's the pattern? Notice that: |
Iff you have
which is true by the definition of
iff:
which only happens when
We've defined an equivalence relation
So we'll adjust our notation:
Thus:
Then:
So instead of using
So we claim that: |
is a Group.- The map
where is a Homomorphism (or Group Morphism) - The map
is an Isomorphism
The General Case
For the more general scenario, say we have some
(see Kernel) is a normal subgroup of- For each
if then . Otherwise then . Altnernatively, this set is for any with . We call these the cosets of .
So in our
The set of distinct cosets (ie: the set of equivalence classes) is a group under the operation:
Then this group is isomorphic to the image of
We'll do a lot more of this among many different lemmas.