# 1-3 are practice computations. #4-9 are practice proofs.
Overall here's how I did:
I edited the order formula for 1a but overall got the answer right
1b is mostly right (small numeric errors) but the cyclic group part was wrong.
2 try to make sure you know the cycle decomposition algorithm (pg 44 on the textbook)
3 I DNF'ed
But the proofs looked perfect!
1
Question
a. Compute the Order of each element in
b. Compute the order of each element in . Is this a Cyclic Group? If so, give a generator.
c. Draw the lattice of subgroups of the additive group
Proof
a. For each of these the order is just
b.
It is cyclic since .
c.
☐
2
Question
Let be the permutation. Write as a product of disjoint cycles and compute its order.
Proof
To compute, let's do the permutations from right to left:
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
3
1
5
4
2
6
2
3
4
6
5
2
1
Thus . Thus, then $
\sigma
= \text{lcm}(3,3) = 3$.
☐
3
Question
Let be the Subgroup generated by the transposition .
a. Determine the Centralizer of in .
b. Determine the Normalizer of in .
c. Determine the Center of in .
Proof
a. We want to get . Namely, we can commute permutations only when they don't share the same number. Using our table, it's the set .
b. We want to get , which in this case is all , which happens only when we check each element:
Result w/
Thus .
c. We want to find . Using our table then in this case since there's only so many elements that can't commute.
(in case on the exam, look at the table method for finding these -izers)
☐
4
Question
Prove that every Group contains a unique identity element.
Proof
Assume for contradiction that it didn't have a unique identity. Label them . Now since is the identity then we can left-multiply it with and get back :
Similarly, since is the identity then we can right-multiply it with to get:
Thus is a contradiction. The identity must be unique!
Let be arbitrary:
Now we can do left-cancellation to get that:
as desired.
☐
6
Question
Suppose a group has no nontrivial proper Subgroup. Prove is cyclic.
Proof
Suppose has no nontrivial proper subgroup; thus only the trivial (proper) subgroup exists for .
Assume for contradiction that is not cyclic. Then has at least two generators where . Now consider the subgroups and . Notice that if we had more generators then has more than one proper subgroup, such as , creating a contradiction. Thus, we can't have 3 or more generators.
But what about just ? Even then our subgroups and are proper subgroups that aren't trivial, creating another contradiction. Thus then for some generator , and thus is cyclic as it's composed of only one generator.
☐
7
Question
Suppose is an Abelian Group and are Subgroups. Prove is a subgroup of . Give an explicit example in which is not a subgroup of .
Proof
To show is a subgroup, first notice that since and .
To show closure, let . Then and . By these being subgroups themselves, then and . Thus as desired.
To show the inverse is in the set, let , so then and . By being subgroups then and , so then as desired.
(Note that you don't actually need to be an Abelian Group in this case)
To show that may not be a subgroup of , consider and and . Notice which is not a subgroup of as it is not closed.
☐
8
Question
Let be a Group and suppose are elements of such that has finite order. Prove that:
Proof
Since is finite order let . Then . Now notice:
Thus .
☐
9 (Hard)
Question
Recall that 2-cycles in (see Symmetric Group & Permutations) are also called transpositions. We say a permutation is even if it can be written as a product of an even number of transpositions; otherwise we say it is odd. For example, in the 4-cycle is odd because it can be written as a product of three transpositions, namely .
For each permutation , define the sign of as follows:
(It is a known fact that is well defined)
a. Compute the sign of each element in .
b. Let denote the subset of all even permutations. Show that is a subgroup of . This subgroup is called the alternating group on elements.
Proof
a.
1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
b. Let , and let only contain even permutations. To show we have already shown it being a subset, so we need to show closure.
For closure under our binary operation, let . Then are both even permutations. Notice then that since they both are even permutations, then they have individual transpositions in their product expansions separately. Say:
Where and is a transposition for each . Now then:
Which has a total of transpositions, an even number! Thus then is even, and thus .
For the inverse being closed, let again. Use our definition to define , where we use instead of . Notice that:
Now, since is still a transposition, then has a product of an even amount of transpositions, and thus .