09 - Working with the -izers
Last time we talked about:
We talked about the example of Conjugation Subgroup below:
Consider Group
Let's look at Stabilizers:
which are all the elements in
For example, for a subset
For a single subset
Some More Specific Examples
Let's put all of these into practice. Let
All of these definitions allow for subsets, and don't restrict to subgroups; however, for this class you can expect we'll usually only consider subgroups.
Let's make a conjugation table for
For the sake of simplicity let
For example:
Notice that this table alone tells you what happens to
Which means look at the rows where all the column entries don't change. We see that only for the first four rows (the
C_{D_{8}}(\langle r \rangle) = { 1, r, r^{2}, r^{3} }
$
which convieniently happened to be the subgroupo
is a weaker condition (one can show that
Knowing the Subgroups
It'd be nice, when computing the Centralizer, if we can make it out of known subgroups. We want a picture of the subgroups of a group. Let's highlight with some tiny examples.
Look at
and
Notice here that the latter includes the former, ie:
So again these subgroups include the trivial subgroup
What about
So we have some sort of tree of inclusions:
What about
What about
You may notice that any generator's subgroup also is equivalent to the inverse generator's subgroup (ex:
How can we generalize this? Here's some facts we can try to prove for
- For any
then (see Order (Groups) for more info). - Every subgroup of
is cyclic, so they are of the form (so you only need one generator). .- There's exactly one unique subgroup for each divisor
of , and it's . assuming and for simplicity.
To highlight these, consider
where using (2) has .- ...
- Here
using (5) - (4) says any divisors that aren't dividing 12 thus are co-prime and generate just
itself.
This picture we draw is a lattice of subgroups of our group