Show that if for some primes (not necessarily distinct) then either is an Abelian Group or (see Center).
Proof
Say . If then we are done so assume . Notice that since then where is not the identity. Then consider the subgroup . Notice it's not the identity so then it has some order .
Surjective: Let . Then choose as then .
Thus then .
b. Suppose where . Using (a) then for any . But since is the unique subgroup and then for all . This is the Equivalences for Normal Subgroups, so then .
☐
8
Question
Prove that if are finite Subgroups of whose orders are relatively prime then .
Proof
Let . Then by Lagrange's Divisibility Theorem of Order of Subgroups then divides and . Now, because and are relatively prime, then (if it wasn't, then they both share some factor, which is composed by some prime). Thus every generator of is just the identity, so then and thus .
Now if then notice that is still a multiple of (inductively) so then it is equivalent to , just as described in the theorem.
If instead then is equivalent to some . Since it is cyclic, then is a valid generator!. Thus it must be order , suggesting that . Multiplying both sides by gives that . But since then:
as desired.
☐
19
Question
Prove that if is a Normal Subgroup of the finite group and (see Index (Groups)) then is the unique subgroup of of order .
Proof
Suppose with being finite. Suppose also so they are coprime. That means that and are coprime.
We just want to show that any other subgroup where then .
Notice then that is a subgroup as is normal. But then:
Let . Then . Then:
But look! That will contradict our requirements as:
Thus then per our requirement, but then that means that but that can only happen if and are the same.
But here the order of is actually , the Euler Totient function, since for any prime then is an element of , while any composite number is made up of multiplicative elements of the primes and thus can be ignored as a unique element. Hence, .
Thus notice:
But since is relatively prime to , then it must be a Cyclic Group and thus generate all of . Thus . Thus:
Thus then . That suggests that is a multiple of , implying that:
☐
23
Question
Determine the last two digits of using the previous question.
Proof
First let's determine . This is done using the previous exercise:
For any , implying that the exponent can be reduced mod 40.
Trying to find , we can do the theorem again using since it is coprime to 40. Notice that:
But what is ? Why it's just 16 (we can look this up, or count the primes ourselves, but is also a Homomorphism (or Group Morphism) as the proof indicates). Thus: