Least Upper Bound of R (via Dedekind Cuts)
We'll prove the following:
here's the definition if you need:
But we'll be proving this in the context of dedekind cuts:
Let
First, let's verify it's a cut:
Proof
- (
). Clearly and since is a cut then . Then so clearly by definition. Similarly, notice that as follows: let be an upper bound of (as given by the definition of ). Since is a cut, then so . Then because for any arbitrary then for some . is bounded by , so then . Thus then . As a result, then (as otherwise then by the definition of a cut, which is a contradiction). Since was arbitrary, then , so choose for example which shows . - (
satisfies (2) of a cut): Let be arbitrary. As such then where . Let . We'll show . Since is a cut, and , then . By the definition of then . - (
satisfies (3) of a cut): Let so s.t. . Since is a cut then s.t. . But then that means that . Thus there always is where and .
☐
Now we need to show thatis an upper bound, and that is the least upper bound.
Proof
- (
is an upper bound of ): . - (
is the least upper bound of ) for any other upper bound has so is the smallest one.
☐