Sequential Criterion for Absence of Uniform Continuity

Sequential Criterion for Absence of Uniform Continuity

A function f:A→R fails to be uniformly continuous on A iff ∃ε0>0 and two sequences (xn),(yn) in A satisfying

|xn−yn|→0,|f(xn)−f(yn)|≥ε0

Proof

Using the negation of Uniform Continuity, then f is not uniformly continuous iff ∃ε0≥0 such that ∀δ>0 we can find two points x,y satisfying |x−y|<δ but with |f(x)−f(y)|≥ε0. Thus, if we set δ1=1 then ∃x1,y1 where |x1−y1|<1 but |f(x1)−f(y1)|≥ε0.

In a similar way if we set δn=1n for any n∈N then ∃xn,yn where |xn−yn|<1n but |f(xn)−f(yn)|≥ε0. The resulting (xn),(yn) sequences satisfy the requirements described in the theorem.

Conversely, if ε0 and (xn),(yn) are as described, it's clear that no δ>0 is a suitable response for ε0.

☐

Example

Consider the function h(x)=sin⁡(1x).

---
title: 
xLabel: 
yLabel: 
bounds: [-1,1,-1,1]
disableZoom: false
grid: true
---
f(x) = sin(1/x)

It is continuous at every point in the open interval (0,1) but not uniformly continuous on the interval. Near 0, where the rapid oscillations take place, the domain values are close together but the range values approach being a distance of 2 apart. For example, take ε0=2 and set:

xn=1π2+2nπ,yn=13π2+2nπ

Because each of these sequences approach 0, we have |xn−yn|→0 and a short calculation gives |h(xn)−h(yn)|=2≥ε0 for all n∈N. Thus, this shows that it is not uniformly continuous at this point.