Then the sequence for all is a subsequence of . It's a proper subsequence if doesn't have all , namely where .
The idea is that we just remove possibly some terms, and then preserve the order.
.
Example
Consider the sequence:
Some sub sequences of these include:
an invalid sub sequence would be:
since the order of terms in the sequence must be preserved.
Notice that each of these sub sequences converges to the same value (namely 0 in this case) to the original sequence. This is what the next theorem tries to show.
The Theorem
Subsequence Convergence Theorem
A subsequence of a convergent sequence converges to the same value as the original sequence.
Proof
Note our observation that . Say converges to some . Then where for all then:
Let be a subsequence. Let . Then where for any then . Suppose . Then by construction then so then as desired.
☐
Example of WCT
Consider the sequence:
we could use the Convergence of a Sequence definition to show this diverges. But we can also show that the subsequences and for all are valid subsequences. They have different limits of -1 and 1 respectively. If itself converged, then these subsequences need to converge to the same limit since Limits are Unique. But they don't, so then by our SCT then the original sequence cannot converge.