given . (ignore the cases when for the inner sequence. At most finitely many )
Scratch Work:
We want, for some :
Consider the cases. If then the case is trivial. If then:
We know that such that for all .
We want, for some :
Notice then:
We want, for some :
Notice that, ignoring the absolute values for a moment:
So putting the absolute values back in:
where since is convergent, then it has a bound , so then . Notice further that since we consider the absolute value of .
Say . Then we want:
Because then we can apply (3) by using the new sequence instead. This means we need to show:
Note that because , then we can make the numerator as small we we like by making large. On the other hand, for the denominator we want some . This will lead to a bound on the size of .
The trick is to look far enough out into the sequence so that the terms are closer to than they are to . Consider . Because then there exists and such that for all . This implies that . So then choose such that implies:
and choose .
Proof
Let . Choose such that:
a. If then we are done (trivial) case.
b. Since then because then . Then:
Let . Since then where implies . Similarly then where implies . Choose , since then letting :
Let . Since then where . Notice that:
And further:
(or choose if . Either way choosing either doesn't affect the later arguments). Then since then where for all then . Similarly since then where for all when .
Now choose . Let . Then:
If we can prove that then we can apply (3) and we are done (assuming ). Let . First note:
Now because then since it's . There's some such that allows for this inequality to hold.
Now notice also that because then notice for a specific that then where for all . Then this implies that .