Limit Laws (Algebraic Limit Theorem)

Algebraic Limit Theorem

Let (an),(bn) be convergent sequences, where ana,bnb. Then:

  1. For cR, lim(can)=ca.
  2. lim(an+bn)=a+b
  3. lim(anbn)=ab
  4. lim(anbn)=ab given b0. (ignore the cases when bn=0 for the inner sequence. At most finitely many bn=0)

Scratch Work:

  1. We want, for some ε>0:
|canca|<ε|c||ana|<ε

Consider the cases. If c=0 then the case is trivial. If c0 then:

|ana|<ε|c|

We know that N such that for all nN.

  1. We want, for some ε>0:
|(an+bn)(a+b)|<ε

Notice then:

|(ana)+(bnb)||ana|<ε2+|bnb|<ε2
  1. We want, for some ε>0:
|anbnab|<ε

Notice that, ignoring the absolute values for a moment:

anbnababn+abn=(ana)bn+a(bnb)

So putting the absolute values back in:

|(anbn)ab|=|(ana)bn+a(bnb)||bn||ana|<ε2M+|a||bnb|<ε2(|a|)ε2(|a|+1)Triangle Ineq.

where since bn is convergent, then it has a bound M, so then |bn|M. Notice further that M>0 since we consider the absolute value of bn.

  1. Say b0. Then we want:
1bn1b

Because then we can apply (3) by using the new sequence 1/bn instead. This means we need to show:

|1bn1b|=|bbn||b||bn|

Note that because (bn)b, then we can make the numerator as small we we like by making n large. On the other hand, for the denominator we want some |bn|δ>0. This will lead to a bound on the size of 1|b||bn|.

The trick is to look far enough out into the sequence (bn) so that the terms are closer to b than they are to 0. Consider ε0=|b|2. Because (bn)b then there exists and N1 such that |bnb|<|b|2 for all nN1. This implies that |bn|>|b|2. So then choose N2 such that NN2 implies:

|bnb|<ε|b|22

and choose N=max(N1,N2).

Proof

  1. Let ε>0. Choose NN such that:
    a. If c=0 then we are done (trivial) case.
    b. Since c0 then because ε|c|>0 then nN|ana|<ε|c| . Then:
|ana|<ε|c||c||ana|<ε|canca|<ε
  1. Let ε>0. Since ε2>0 then N1 where nN1 implies |ana|<ε2. Similarly then N2 where nN2 implies |bnb|<ε2. Choose N=max(N1,N2)N, since then letting nN:
|(an+bn)(a+b)=|(ana)+(bnb)||ana|+|bnb|ΔInequality<ε2+ε2=ε
  1. Let ε>0. Since bnb then M0 where |bn|M. Notice that:
ε>0ε2M>0

And further:

ε>0ε2(|a|+1)>0

(or choose ε/2(|a|) if |a|0. Either way choosing either doesn't affect the later arguments). Then since ana then N1 where for all nN1 then |ana|<ε2(|a|+1). Similarly since bnb then N2 where for all nN2 when |bnb|<ε2M.

Now choose N=max(N1,N2). Let nN. Then:

|anbnab|=|anbnabn+abnab|=|(ana)bn+a(bnb)||bn||ana|+|a||bnb|<|bn|ε2M+|a|ε2(|a|+1)<ε2|bn|M+ε2|a|<ε2(|a|+1)=ε
  1. If we can prove that 1bn1b then we can apply (3) and we are done (assuming b0). Let ε>0. First note:
|1bn1b|=|bbn||b||bn|

Now because (bn)b then |bnb|<ε|b|22 since it's >0. There's some N2 such that nN2 allows for this inequality to hold.

Now notice also that because (bn)b then notice for a specific ε0=|b|2 that then N1 where |bnb|<|b|2 for all nN1. Then this implies that |bn|>|b|2.

Thus choose N=max(N1,N2) so then for all nN:

|1bn1b|=|bbn|1|b||bn|<ε|b|221|b||b|2=ε