Now consider the abstract, general case of where and . Let . Then let similar to our previous example:
So if then . Showing that is unbounded would imply that is unbounded, showing a divergent series.
We could do a bound in the other direction too:
So if then .
This gives the following:
Cauchy Condensation Test
Suppose that and . Then:
Proof
Let , be as in the theorem. For set:
For the suppose converge.s. Then such that for all . Then we have (using and multiplying all sides by 2):
Thus is bounded, so then 's partial sums are bounded, so it must converge.
2. For the suppose converges. Then it has some bound where we have . Let . We can always pick some such that . Then:
So then is bounded, implying that is bounded and thus convergent.
☐
Example: -Series
-Series
The series converges iff .
Let . Determine the convergence for:
If then so then the partial sums are which is a divergence sequence. Hence the series diverges in this case.