Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.
Scratch work:
Here we split each interval, and choose the one that has infinitely-many terms. Here we have it that:
We can pick an element , then the next element , and so on.
More formally, pick an such that , where and . Continue with such that and . Repeat as needed. We get that, by the Nested Interval Property, that Proof
Let be a bounded sequence so that where for all . Bisect the closed interval into the two closed intervals and (the midpoint is in both halves). Now it must be that at least one of these closed intervals contains an infinite number of the terms in the sequence . Select a half for which this is the case and label that interval as . Then let be some term in the sequence satisfying .
Next we bisect into closed intervals of equal length and let be again the half that contains infinitely many terms from . Select an from the original sequence with and .
In general if we construct the closed interval by taking a half of containing an infinite number of terms of and then select so that .
We want to argue that is a convergent subsequence. But we need a candidate for the limit. Via the Nested Interval Property since: