Series, Convergence of A Series

Before our definition, consider an infinite sum n=1an=a1+a2+a3+. Then the sequence of partial sums sn is just the first n-terms summed up:

sn=k=1nak=a1+a2++an

So given the definition of a convergent sequence, we'll have a definition for a convergent series as well.

Series

An infinite series is a formal expression of the form:

n=1an=a1+a2+

To this we associate a sequence of partial sums is the sequence (sm)mN defined as:

sm=a1+a2++am

We say that n=1an converges to sR and write:

n=1an=s

To mean that (sm)s.

The difficulty here is that (sm) is usually very hard to compute. But let's look at a simple one.

Example: Geometric Series

Let rR. Consider:

n=0rn=1+r+r2+sm=1+r+r2++rm

Recall that in general that: akbk=(ab)(ak+ak1b++bk) (multiply out the right side to verify). With that then:

1rm+1=(1r)(1+r+r2++rm)=(1r)sm

So long as r1 (which diverges anyways) then:

sm=1rm+11r=11r+(11r)rm+1

Then from our talk on Monotonic Sequences:

Monotonic Sequences

A Sequence (an) is

  • increasing if nN we have anan+1
  • decreasing if nN we have anan+1
  • monotone if it is either increasing or decreasing.

See also Monotone Convergence Theorem.

Gives us that when r(0,1) then:

sm11r+(11r)limrm+1=11r

So if |r|<1 then |rm+1|0 so then rm+10, allowing us to make this deduction.

If instead |r|>1 then rm+1 is unbounded, so then the sequence has to diverge (since all sequences are bounded, so unbounded must imply divergent).

If r=1 then it diverges since it's also unbounded as sm=m+1. If r=1 then:

(rm+1)=(1,1,1,1,)

Which is divergent since we can use the definition of convergence and show that we can choose ε=12 such that any bound is missing 1 or 1, showing divergence.

Using the ALT

Using the Limit Laws (Algebraic Limit Theorem) then:

n=0rn

is:

Showing any series converges.

Consider for a moment the series n=1an where nN, an0 and an+1an. As a result, we have to have (sm) be increasing (since there's no negative terms to decrease the partial sum), and thus monotonic. Using the Monotonic Sequences then the only way n=1an converges iff (sm) is bounded above (obviously it is bounded below already).
So the name of the game to show the series converges is to show an upper bound for the partial sums. Similarly, to show it diverges, show that no such upper bound can exist.

Series converges Bounded Partial Sums

A series n=1 where an0 and an+1an for all nN converges iff (sm), the sequence of partial sums, is bounded above.

Proof
See our remark above.

Example 2

Consider the series:

n=1=1+122+132+

It's a p-series with p=2>1 so we expect it to converge. But let's show it converges. We'll show that there's a bound for sm. Notice that:

sm=1+122+132++1m2

Notice that:

sm=1+122+132++1m2Incomputable1+112+123++1(m1)mSlightly bigger, but computable=1+(1112)+(1213)++(1m11m)1(x1)x=1x11x=1+1(1212)(1313)++(1m11m1)1m=21m<2

Thus then sm is bounded above by 2, so then the series converges. Not only that, but by the Limits and Order (Order Limit Theorem), then it converges to some value less than 2.

Example 3: Harmonic Series

Consider:

n=11n=1+12+13+

we know that this diverges, but let's prove it. We have to show that (sm) is unbounded. Then:

sm=1+12+13++1mIncomputable=1+12+13++12kLet m=2k for a moments2k=1+12+(13+14)214+(15++18)418++(12k1+1++12k)2k112k1+12+12+12++12k times=1+k2

Clearly as k then 1+k2 (diverges) so then s2k must also diverge since it's unbounded.

Example 4: The General Case

Now consider the abstract, general case of nN where an0 and an+1an. Let sm=n=1man. Then let m=2k similar to our previous example:

s2k=a1+a2+(a3+a4)+(a5++a8)++(a2k1+1++a2k)a1+a2+2a4+4a8++2k1a2k12(a1+2a2+4a4++2ka2k):=tk

So if m2k then sm12tk. Showing that tk is unbounded would imply that s2k is unbounded, showing a divergent series.

We could do a bound in the other direction too:

s2k=a1+(a2+a3)2a2+(a4++a7)4a4+(a8++a15)8a8++(1a2k1++1a2k1)+a2k2k1a2k1a1+2a2+4a4+8a8++2k1a2k1+2kak=tk

So if m2k then smtk.