We'll need some properties of to be able to determine this suprema. So let's get to those:
Let be nonempty and bounded above, and let . Define the set by:
Then .
Proof
For (i), set . We see that for all consequently, but then as required.
For (ii), let be an arbitrary upper bound for , so then for all . Then for all . So then is an upper bound for . Since is the least upper bound for , then we have it that , thus , completing (ii).