52 Derivatives and the Intermediate Value Property
5.2.2
Question
Exactly one of the following requests is impossible. Decide which it is, and provide examples for the other three. In each case, let's assume the functions are defined on all of .
a. Functions not differentiable at zero but where is differentiable at zero.
b. A function not differentiable at zero and a function differentiable at zero where is differentiable at zero.
c. A function not differentiable at zero and a function differentiable at zero where is differentiable at zero.
d. A function differentiable at zero but not differentiable at any other point.
Proof
a. Possible. Use . Here which is differentiable at zero but both are not.
b. Possible. Notice in comparison to (c) that that argument doesn't work if we can have . Thus use and . Then clearly is differentiable at 0 (along with ), but is not differentiable at 0.
c. Impossible. If is differentiable at zero and is as well, then:
was continuous at every strictly irrational point. We want kind-of the opposite, because we need continuity at zero in order to get close to differentiability. If we define:
Follow these steps to provide a slightly modified proof of the Chain Rule.
a. Show that a function is differentiable at iff which is continuous at and satisfies:
b. Use this criterion for differentiability (in both directions) to prove the Chain Rule.
Proof
a.
(): Suppose is differentiable at . Construct as:
Notice that since is differentiable at then:
exists, and thus is continuous at .
(): Suppose where is continuous at and defined such that:
for all . We want to show that for our that is differentiable, meaning we need to show the following exists:
which it does by being continuous.
b. Let and where are intervals and . Suppose is differentiable at and is differentiable at . We want to show that:
To do this, we can try to use (a) to construct some that is continuous at instead. Notice first that if we multiply the top and bottom by , letting be arbitrary:
Let .
a. For which values of is continuous at zero?
b. For which values of is differentiable at zero? In this case, is the derivative function continuous?
c. For which values of is twice-differentiable?
Proof
a. is continuous at zero iff:
Thus if then that doesn't work, and any gives an asymptote that makes the limit not exist. All other values give the limit value we expect, so then it's continuous iff .
b. is differentiable at zero iff:
exists. Considering both sides:
Now similar to this only exists iff . When this happens then:
which is only continuous at all points (repeat the (a) argument with a constant in the front).
c. Doing a similar process for (a) and (b), we get that for it to be twice differentiable.
☐
5.2.7
Question
Let:
Find a particular (potentially non-integer) value for so that:
a. is differentiable on but such that is unbounded on .
b. is differentiable on with continuous but not differentiable at zero.
c. is differentiable on and is differentiable on but such that is not continuous at zero.
Proof
Before any parts, is differentiable on iff:
exists. So for differentiation we need here. For being unbounded, computing the derivative:
b. If we want to be continuous but not differentiable at zero, we need differentiable, but unboundedness (similar to (a)) for now, so do the same processes we did in the scratch with instead. You'll get that for the differentiability part, and for the continuity part. Thus use .
c. This is the exact same as (b), just use instead of . Thus you'll need (differentiability) and (unbounded, no continuity at 0) so use .
Notice for this whole process that:
Hence we could've used this property instead, but that wouldn't be mathematically rigorous.
☐
5.2.10
Question
Recall that a function is increasing on if for all . A familiar mantra from calculus is that a differentiable function is increasing if its derivative is positive, but this statement requires some sharpening in order to be completely accurate. Show that the function:
is differentiable on and satisfies . Now prove that is not increasing over any open interval containing 0.
In the next section we will see that is indeed increasing on iff for all .
Proof
For comprehension, let's find the derivative numerically at 0, since at any point it's just:
Notice that this value equals that we calculated above, so then is differentiable on all of . Further, we've shown that . But notice that at some point around zero, which the next step shows that is not increasing.
Now to show that is not increasing on any open interval containing , let such that so that is our open interval containing 0. WLOG we'll show that we can always find a point such that , thus contradicting increasing. Choose such that (which is guarunteed by the Archimedian Principle). Then: