1.5.4, 1.5.6, 1.5.8, 1.5.9 (Optional: 1.5.10 (outlines the proof to the Schröder-Bernstein theorem))
1.5.4 (later the proof sucks)
Question
a. Show for any interval .
b. Show that an unbounded interval like has the same cardinality as as well.
c. Using open intervals makes it more convenient to produce the required bijections, but it is not necessary. Show that by exhibiting a bijective function between the two sets.
Proof
a. Consider the function defined as:
We claim that is a bijection:
(Injective): Let . Then:
☐
1.5.6
Question
a. Give an example of a countable collection of disjoint open intervals.
b. Give an example of an uncountable collection of disjoint open intervals, or argue that no such collection exists.
Proof
a. Define . Clearly each so then .
b. This is impossible. Say such an uncountable collection exists. For any nonempty interval The Density of Q in R says that where . Assign each , implies that and thus is countable.
☐
1.5.8 (finish)
Question
Let with the property that . Then is either finite or countable.
Proof
Notice that . since any number bigger than implies that it is not in . As a result is finite.
Similarly notice that must be countable. In general if we prove that is countable, then we are done since which are all countable subsets.
☐
1.5.9
Question
A real number is called algebraic if there exist integers , not all zero, such that:
Real numbers that are not roots of a polynomial like this are called transcendental number.
a. Show that are algebraic.
b. Fix and let be the algebraic numbers obtained as roots of polynomials with integer coefficients that have degree . Using the fact that every polynomial has a finite number of roots, show that is countable.
c. Now, argue that the set of all algebraic numbers is countable. What may we conclude about the set of transcendental numbers?
Proof
a. is a solution to . is a solution to .
Also has the solution of .
b. We'll show .
i. for all since if we define the sets then is a countable set clearly. Thus then then is countable.
ii. Since then the bijection exists. Then applying in a piecewise fashion to define shows that is a bijection as a result.
iii. Use the bijection by choosing the entries to be the polynomials integer coefficients. Clearly is a bijection since each polynomial has a vector we can construct, and vice versa (surjective), and two polynomials with the same coefficients have the same roots (injective).
c. The set of all algebraic numbers is just so then is countable. As a result, since and are all the transcendentals, since is uncountable then we must have it that is uncountable. So there are way more transcendentals than algebraic numbers.
☐
1.5.10 (I did a wrong)
Question
a. Let be uncountable. Show that there exists such that is uncountable.
b. Now let be the set of all such that is uncountable, and set . Is an uncountable set?
c. Does the statement in (a) remain true if 'uncountable' is replaced by "infinite"?
Proof
a.
Choose . Then:
the set so then since is uncountable then must be uncountable. Thus then is uncountable.
b.
Notice in general for any that:
Notice is always uncountable since . Thus then is uncountable.