Lecture 31 - Finishing Complexification

From last time:

complexification of V, VC

Suppose V is a real vector space.

  • The complexification of V, denoted VC, equals V×V. An element of VC is an ordered pair (u,v) where u,v∈V, but we'll write this as u+iv.
  • Addition on VC is defined by:
    (u1+iv1)+(u2+iv2)=(u1+u2)+i(v1+v2)
    for u1,v1,u2,v2∈V.
  • Complex scalar multiplication on VC is defined by:
    (a+bi)(u+iv)=(au−bv)+i(av+bu)
    for a,b∈R and u,v∈V.

... (see the Chapter 9 notes or last lecture for more details).

9.B: Normal Operators and Isometries on Real Inner Product Spaces

Let V be a real inner product space with T∈L(V). Then:

  1. T is normal iff ∃ an orthonormal basis β for which M(T,β) is block diagonal, where each block is 1×1 or 2×2.
    1. If a block is 2×2 then it looks like [a−bba] with b>0. (this is because the matrix has to equal its conjugate transpose to be normal, which in the real vector spaces is just the transpose)
  2. T is an isometry iff ∃ an orthonormal basis β for which M(T,β) is block diagonal, where each block is 1×1 or 2×2, EXCEPT:
    1. The 1×1 blocks are ±1
    2. The 2×2 blocks are of the form [cos⁡(θ)−sin⁡(θ)sin⁡(θ)cos⁡(θ)]

Looking at:

Every operator has an invariant subspace of dimension 1 or 2.

Every operator on a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space has an invariant subspace of dimension 1 or 2.

This is where the blocks of these sizes come from. Namely for T∈L(V) that's normal:

Let's prove (1) above:
Proof
Let T∈L(V) be normal and V is real. Then V has a dimension 1 or 2 subspace that's T-invariant. Then:

V=U⊕U⊥

It turns out that T|U is normal and T|U⊥ is also normal. Thus, we can reapply the argument all the way down until we have only dim=1,2 subspaces, which we know are of the form above:

V=⨁j=1mUj

where T|Uj is normal and dim⁡Uj=1,2.
☐

For the isometry, we can do something similar. If T is an isometry where dim⁡(V)=2 then we require that T∗T=TT∗=I so then we require that:

M(T∗T)=M(I)⇔a2+b2=1,c2+d2=1

But since T is not self-adjoint then b≠0, so it seems clear that we should define θ=arccos⁡(a) then have:

b=sin⁡(θ)

as a result, giving the matrix we desired. Notice that since θ∈[0,π] then that makes b>0 as required.