The complexification of , denoted , equals . An element of is an ordered pair where , but we'll write this as .
Addition on is defined by:
for .
Complex scalar multiplication on is defined by:
for and .
... (see the Chapter 9 notes or last lecture for more details).
9.B: Normal Operators and Isometries on Real Inner Product Spaces
Let be a real inner product space with . Then:
is normal iff an orthonormal basis for which is block diagonal, where each block is or .
If a block is then it looks like with . (this is because the matrix has to equal its conjugate transpose to be normal, which in the real vector spaces is just the transpose)
is an isometry iff an orthonormal basis for which is block diagonal, where each block is or , EXCEPT:
The blocks are
The blocks are of the form
Looking at:
Every operator has an invariant subspace of dimension 1 or 2.
Every operator on a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space has an invariant subspace of dimension 1 or 2.
This is where the blocks of these sizes come from. Namely for that's normal:
If we have blocks that represents a Self-Adjoint transformation we have
If it's not self-adjoint then consider normal. We require that for the matrix (since we can equate terms in the transpose). Calculating shows that the matrix has to be
Let's prove (1) above: Proof
Let be normal and is real. Then has a dimension 1 or 2 subspace that's -invariant. Then:
It turns out that is normal and is also normal. Thus, we can reapply the argument all the way down until we have only subspaces, which we know are of the form above:
where is normal and .
☐
For the isometry, we can do something similar. If is an isometry where then we require that so then we require that:
But since is not self-adjoint then , so it seems clear that we should define then have:
as a result, giving the matrix we desired. Notice that since then that makes as required.