The zeroes of the characteristic polynomial are precisely the eigenvalues of .
Axler would disapprove, but usually the characteristic polynomial is defined using the determinant:
But it's harder to find these facts using the determinant definition. Hence why Axler does this.
Cayley-Hamilton Theorem
This is a big theorem, but it's a one liner as we've done all the leg work to get to this point:
Cayley-Hamilton Theorem
Every operator on a complex vector space is a root (namely a zero) of its characteristic polynomial.
What this says is that:
Proof
Use the definition with :
And if we plug in any vector , then we know that:
So then:
where each . Notice that:
Thus as was arbitrary.
☐
This begs the question:
Question
Every operator is a zero of it's characteristic polynomial, namely . But is it possible that it could be the zero of a polynomial of lesser degree? Namely, could we reduce the degree of such that we get the same property?
As an example, consider:
Notice then that:
So then is the only eigenvalue and has multiplicity 3. Thus we can write down:
We know that as we expect. But we don't need the 3rd power in this case for the Cayley Hamilton Theorem to be true. We could instead have:
Heck we could've even done a squared term and gotten something similar. But finding the smallest degree is of interest, and is called the minimal polynomial.
minimal polynomial
Suppose where is a complex vector space. The minimal polynomial of is defined to be the unique monic polynomial (the leading coefficient is equal to 1) , of smallest degree, such that:
Fact
Any polynomial with can only happen iff is a multiple of .