The Hamiltonian of a quantum state is given by . Supposing, if we measure the quantum state in an arbitrary basis, which eigenvalue is the most probable? Also, calculate the expectation value of that state.
Proof
We find the eigenvalues of . First, finding all the eigenstates implies finding all the eigenvectors for :
with corresponding e-vectors:
this is our eigenbasis. We need to compose out of these:
Therefore, when we measure we'll (most likely) get since the number in front of is the largest magnitude.
For expectation value, we just do:
Note that if we had to do it with then we'd need to normalize, then find the expectation value.
☐
3.8
Theorem
The basis vectors for a qutrit are . In matrix form, the basis states are defined as:
If the state of the system is defined as , and the measurement operator , what are the possible measurements? What are their probabilities?
Proof
What helps is to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for our measurement operator. Notice that it's a diagonal matrix, so we can shortcut and say that are the eigenstates, with corresponding eigenvalues of respectively. These are our measurements.
To get their probabilities, we just take the magnitude of each ket:
and the measurements would be the expectation values of respectively, which are respectively.
☐
5.2
Theorem
The state of a three-qubit system is described as . Verify whether this is a valid quantum state. (Hint: the norm of a valid quantum state is 1.)
Proof
As the hint implies, we should make sure that is of unit length. As such:
Here, notice that if we just have the top part:
Notice that our is not the same size as our norm of the same vector , which point in the same direction while is of unit length. As such, is not a valid quantum state.
Note
We can use this to show that HW 2 - Starting QC Calculations#^f307aa's is not a valid state there. However, the answer there is still correct, assuming a normalized .
☐
5.3
Theorem
The state of a qubit is described by , where and . Check whether the wavefunction is normalized, and if it is, evaluate the probability of measuring the qubit in a state of or .
Proof
We can determine the norm of the vector:
thus the norm is 1, so is correctly normalized. To evaluate the probability of measuring the qubit in a state of or :
Thus it is more likely to measure the qubit in a state of than .
☐
5.4
Theorem
When we discussed global and relative phases, it became clear that and are the same state, excepting up to a phase, which cannot be measured. Explain why the same argument does not hold good for the states and .
Proof
Looking back at comparing and , the reason that these were the same state, barring phase, was that their probabilities are equivalent:
thus why we can't measure the 180 degree phase difference in their 's. Furthermore, when we measure them, we can do so relative to an eigenbasis where is a basis vector, so the factor still means that these 's are relating to the same set of eigenvectors (as any eigenvector is a scalar multiple of some normed on, which and are just scalar multiples of each other).
But for this new case, notice that the negative effect doesn't occur to the whole vector, just the part. If we had a flipped sign on then the same argument applies. To make sure this is correct, one can consider the evolution between states: