HW 2 - Starting QC Calculations

2.18

Theorem

If u|=ibii| and |v=iai|i then:

u|v=iaibi

Proof

u|v=(ibii|)(iai|i)=ijbii|aj|j=ijbiaji|j=ijajbiχ(i=j)=iaibi

3.5

Theorem

The Hamiltonian of a quantum state |ψ=[1,2,1] is given by H=[203010302]. Supposing, if we measure the quantum state in an arbitrary basis, which eigenvalue is the most probable? Also, calculate the expectation value of that state.

Proof
We find the eigenvalues of H. First, finding all the eigenstates implies finding all the eigenvectors for H:

p(λ)=(2λ)(1λ)(2λ)3(3)=(2λ)2(1λ)+9=(44λ+λ2)(1λ)+9=λ1=5,λ2=1,λ3=1

with corresponding e-vectors:

v1=(1,0,1),v2=(1,0,1),v3=(0,1,0)

this is our eigenbasis. We need to compose |ψ out of these:

|ψ=v1+0v2+2v3

Therefore, when we measure we'll (most likely) get λ3=1 since the number in front of v3 is the largest magnitude.

For expectation value, we just do:

H^=ψ|H^|ψ=(1,2,1)H(1,2,1)=(1,2,1)(5,2,5)=5+4+5=14

Note that if we had to do it with v1,v2 then we'd need to normalize, then find the expectation value.

3.8

Theorem

The basis vectors for a qutrit are |0,|1,|2. In matrix form, the basis states are defined as:

|0=[100],|1=[010],|2=[001]

If the state of the system is defined as |ψ=2|0+3|1+5|238, and the measurement operator [200030006], what are the possible measurements? What are their probabilities?

Proof
What helps is to find the eigenvalues λi and eigenvectors |ei for our measurement operator. Notice that it's a diagonal matrix, so we can shortcut and say that |0,|1,|2 are the eigenstates, with corresponding eigenvalues of 2,3,6 respectively. These are our measurements.

To get their probabilities, we just take the magnitude of each ket:

P(|0)=|238|210.53%P(|1)=|338|223.68%P(|2)=|538|265.79%

and the measurements would be the expectation values of |0,|1,|2 respectively, which are λ1=2,λ2=3,λ3=6 respectively.

5.2

Theorem

The state of a three-qubit system is described as 123(|0+|0+|1). Verify whether this is a valid quantum state. (Hint: the norm of a valid quantum state is 1.)

Proof
As the hint implies, we should make sure that |ψ is of unit length. As such:

|ψ=2|0+|123

Here, notice that if we just have the top part:

|ψ=2|0+|1|ψψ=|ψ22+12=|ψ5|ψ

Notice that our |ψ is not the same size as our norm of the same vector |ψ, which point in the same direction while |ψ is of unit length. As such, |ψ is not a valid quantum state.

Note

We can use this to show that HW 2 - Starting QC Calculations#^f307aa's |ψ is not a valid state there. However, the answer there is still correct, assuming a normalized |ψ.

5.3

Theorem

The state of a qubit is described by |ψ=a|0+b|1, where a=13(1+i) and b=3.53(1+i). Check whether the wavefunction is normalized, and if it is, evaluate the probability of measuring the qubit in a state of |0 or |1.

Proof
We can determine the norm of the vector:

|ψ=|a|2+|b|2=|13(1+i)|2+|3.53(1+i)|2=1922+3.5922=2+79=1

thus the norm is 1, so |ψ is correctly normalized. To evaluate the probability of measuring the qubit in a state of |0 or |1:

P(|0)=|13(1+i)|2=29P(|1)=|3.53(1+i)|2=79

Thus it is more likely to measure the qubit in a state of |1 than |0.

5.4

Theorem

When we discussed global and relative phases, it became clear that |1 and |1 are the same state, excepting up to a phase, which cannot be measured. Explain why the same argument does not hold good for the states 12(|0+|1) and 12(|0|1).

Proof
Looking back at comparing |1 and |1, the reason that these were the same state, barring phase, was that their probabilities are equivalent:

|1|H^|1|2=H2

thus why we can't measure the 180 degree phase difference in their ai's. Furthermore, when we measure them, we can do so relative to an eigenbasis where |1 is a basis vector, so the 1 factor still means that these |1's are relating to the same set of eigenvectors (as any eigenvector is a scalar multiple of some normed on, which |1 and |1 are just scalar multiples of each other).

But for this new case, notice that the negative effect doesn't occur to the whole vector, just the |1 part. If we had a flipped sign on |0 then the same argument applies. To make sure this is correct, one can consider the evolution between states:

|[21/221/2]H^[21/221/2]|2H2