A subset of a vector space is a subspace of (which is over field ) if is a vector space itself (over the same field and using the same operations as those in ).
This is a pretty simple definition. It's just a smaller vector space inside of another one. For example:
Thus we require certain conditions on the subspace:
Subspace conditions
is a subspace of iff:
, so contains the additive identity
for any two vectors . This is closure under addition.
for any . This is closure under scalar multiplication.
Note that (1) says that . But this is really saying that must be the same as the one from . But why is this guaranteed?!?!? Suppose that where both are still additive identities from their respective sets. Let be arbitrary, and notice that . Cancel from both sides and see that .
Another example:
Example
Let . Is a subspace of ?
Proof
It is because:
so and so .
Let be arbitrary, so . Then notice that so .
Let and be arbitrary, so . Then notice that so then .
☐
Direct Sums of Subspaces
Sums of Subspaces
Given subspaces of , then sum of , denoted by:
Is the smallest subspaces containing each .
Note that any could be , or even any linear combination of vectors from . Thus, this simple addition allows vector combinations between possibly different subspaces.
A direct sum goes one step further in saying that each vector in this space can be written uniquely in this way. When it's a direct sum we say: