This circuit is known as the pseudo NMOS since circuit operation is similar to that of NMOS logic, even though it is usually in CMOS designs we'll see later.
For our purposes we'll use the same values from prior.
Calculation of and .
For the PMOS we have and thus the transistor is in the conducting state, so since and , so we'll have saturation:
giving:
For the other , we need . Using Figure 6.24b, as before we have in the saturation state. When we have as off, so current flows through the PMOS to charge the output node until of the transistor collapses to zero, so .
Finding first, we need a relationship between . We guess when we have in the saturation region and that will be in the triode. This is because we are in some states between the being totally cutoff, and is in a similar boat. One being in cutoff isn't super interesting, so it's better when both aren't just in cutoff, and one is in a different state than the other (as otherwise the voltages just get scaled).
Thus:
we care when the slope , so do the derivative. We solve for instead since it's easier to extract, and actually find when the reciprocal is -1 (which is the same as the normal derivative). Giving:
the derivative is tedious and gives:
and:
you can calculate values and check that our assumptions were actually right the whole time. A similar process finds , where we flip and assume that is in saturation and is in triode. Doing a similar process gives:
and:
7.1: CMOS Inverter Technology
CMOS requires both a PMOS and NMOS together on one IC subtrate.
Note, there's an implied diode between the -well and -type substrate. Thus, we need it to be reverse biased all the time, via using good connections of and .
The connections above create the following circuit diagram:
The generic way it works is that if the NMOS is on, the PMOS is off. If the PMOS is on, the NMOS is off. Thus, we create an open on one side, giving rise to becoming either or . In the intermediary, there will be time where both are on, creating the undefined region we've seen with previous inverter circuits.
One interesting thing is that the bodies of both transistors are connected to their respective sources, so so there is no body effect.
For this we'll use the following values:
Note that:
Usually .
and . So why are the values above not equal? Hole mobility in a PMOS is about 40% of the hole mobility in that of an NMOS, hence the difference.
Thus, and .
One way to layout the substrate is via:
7.2: Static Characteristics for CMOS Inverter
Consider the following:
First, consider when . Then for the NMOS, and for the PMOS. For the NMOS so a channel exists in the NMOS. But the PMOS is off since . So in (a), the capacitor discharges through the NMOS and , until there's not any current through , and no current goes through .
Once is set to , then for the NMOS so it's off. For the PMOS so a channel exists. gets charged from the 2.5V supply connected to . Once steady-state is reached, and have no current through since the NMOS is off.
Note that and . Also the logic swing , and the static power dissipations is zero, as the DC current is zero (eventually) in both logic states.
7.2.1: CMOS Voltage Transfer Characteristics
We have 5 regions:
Note that the boundary between region 2 and 3 (and 3 and 4) is defined by the triode/saturation regions of operation. Saturation in occurs when:
similarly we can find the other line equation for when enters saturation:
when then we get that . But when , then it shifts away from this value. Recall that we defined .
Using the figure, when then we move the to the left, and vice verse for .
A nice thing about CMOS inverters is that they can operate at low voltages, where we've gotten as low as , which can get as low as .
7.2.2: Noise Margins for CMOS
Finding . For near this value, we assume that PMOS is saturated and NMOS is in triode, giving:
we can simplify this to:
solving for gives an equation we can take the derivative of and set it to -1, giving our value for :
for when :
The whole process is the exact same, except the PMOS is in triode and NMOS is in saturation: