Rather now . We'll need to change our width-length ratios as a result. Consider when . Then on the switching MOSFET (ie: the NMOS) we have it that so then . We assume stays the same.
on the , while it is , so then so then we are in triode for the NMOS. Since in the spec stays unchanged, we can assume , so then:
Now consider the noise margins and . We can first find all . We note that:
So we can use our equations:
So then:
and then:
thus:
6.95
We'll design an NMOS inverter to operate from and with a power of . We assume and .
We'll choose to use the Pseudo NMOS inverter design. First, let's get :
we also can assume from the table that and .
Now we consider when , and then . Notice for that then we get that (always) and so then so then so we are in saturation:
so then we get that .
Moving to the , we care about the triode state, which occurs when and , and we can check that , so then . Thus:
Now for the noise margins. We can use the equations derived for us:
Thus:
7.15
Consider the following circuit:
This is a Pseudo NMOS. We'll find and for this gate. Consider when we , then we get .
a
Notice for the top PMOS that so then assuming using the value then no matter our state. Clearly so then we'll be in saturation no matter what. Furthermore, in this state for NMOS we have and , and since then so then we are in triode.
So then equate the currents:
We can assume that since when and vice versa we have is off, so then as there's no current running through the PMOS (so it's in triode and ):
Notice that plugging in these values into our analysis from above, we get the expected saturation results, and our assumption for still remains valid as
b
Repeat but with . We yield the same conclusions:
And our saturation assumptions are correct once again.
c
Repeat but with :
Again we still have for our saturation assumption.
7: CMOS Inverters
7.2
We draw the cross section for a CMOS process using a -well rather than an -well:
7.5
Consider the following circuit:
Here we say and . We'll find for this inverter.
a
This is a standard CMOS inverter circuit. We know that , as given when we have a , of which so then is off, and then is in triode, no current flows, so then .
But when then . Here, we get the same scenario, except roles are switched. Now is off, and is on but no current flows. As such, then , so .
b
We have the same reasoning and get and .
7.11
We have a CMOS inverter such that . Use and .
a
When then so then we have just that .
b
If we are given that then we know that each . Further, we are given . We know that for the NMOS that and likewise , notice that so then we are in saturation. For the PMOS, we have it that and so then still the PMOS likewise is in saturation:
which then implies that as expected. We can use our assumed value that to get:
c
We repeat (a). Notice now that , so then since then we have . We know, as our prior reasoning implied from (b), that since we are at then we are in saturation for both:
giving:
d
We can do the same analysis as we had done before:
7.16
We need to find for a minimum size CMOS inverter where both , if and . We can assume that and . Thus, at we have saturation in both:
We are given that all and for PMOS and NMOS. We need to find the current as shown above. We assume .
First, what will help is finding the connecting current between both CMOS inverters.
For the NMOS transistors, we have so , implying that is in cutoff, so we can ignore it. For we have the opposite, where so . Let's assume that so then is in triode.
Notice that for the transistors that we have and likewise . Notice then that so clearly is in cutoff and can be ignored. , so to have we'll assume that so then which fits our range. In that case, then should be in triode:
Thus, equate the currents:
We know and , so equate the equations and get that:
which satisfies that as needed. Plug this into our current equation to get the current:
7.23
A CMOS inverter has , where we sink a current of and maintain . When then the CMOS sources a current of , and maintains . We'll find the minimum ratios of the NMOS and PMOS to meet this, using .
When we have , then the we have the as "on" and as "off", so is triode and is in saturation. We can just focus on the triode part, as it contains solving in there. We know here that :
we can use the maximum value as if we do then we can guarantee that we are always under that limit:
In a similar way, when we have then we have the opposite effect, where here and :